- #Iridient x transformer vs sylk manual#
- #Iridient x transformer vs sylk software#
- #Iridient x transformer vs sylk mac#
Am not saying that I think it's best practice to over sharpen your images, but if you'd wish a tat more sharpness, which would essentially work with another Tool, then it's sad a "Pro" Software like Lightroom can't do it for you. Second off, If you want to perceive it less than it is, cause you're an Adobe fan or any other reason, then that is most likely possible by just sharpening less. Issue is still discussed about in the web: This link BTW also mentions, that Adobe seems to have bought the sharpening routine. Long story short: Seeing is believing, and I see wormy artifacts in Lightroom.įirst off, the link I provided is intentionally an old one, since I meant to point out, that this is a everlasting issue and should be fixed by now. Now, that all being said, many Fujifilm X users avoid all the Adobe issues, real or perceived, By using third party RAF converters, namely Iridient X Transformer. In the link you provided, the author goes gong ho in amount slider, bad bad bad. Third lots of continuing issue opinons may be colored by past history.įourth, many users with issues turn out to be sharpen often, sharpen hard, abusersįifth, you should not sharpen x images in the same way you woul other sensors. Second off, lots of the TRANS X issues were more perceived than actual Some love the round trip convenience of the "edit in" functionality in Lightroom, but there are several different ways of using the two together.First off, the link you shared appears to be old, no actual date in the article, but “Spring came out of nowhere three weeks ago”, and X-T2? Adobe has made improvements in LR, in ACE, and in DNG converter since the X-T2 days.
#Iridient x transformer vs sylk manual#
But you do have to do a manual "folder sync" step at the end. Supports multiple images at once, fewer dialogs to click through, don't have to waste time waiting for LR do its own processing of the intermediate image, etc. If you use the drag and drop, folder sync method (on the Mac) in the end its a bit faster and more flexible. Iridient Developer has to have a preference for this option as some also use it as an external editor for sharpening, monochrome conversion and other functionality with standard format (TIFF, JPEG) images too. Iridient Developer can work with RAW or standard image formats as well so there is a preference option to force it to work with RAW and use the LR intermediate standard format image solely as a reference to the original RAW.
With X-Transformer it will only work with RAW period. Absolutely can use Lightroom's Edit In functionality for RAW with either product. Not impossible, just a PITA that I've grown to avoid. The workflow with Iridient currently requires that I go back to that date folder, sync, and try to find it amongst potentially hundreds of files.
Then, I just work out of the "In Progress" collection. At the same time, I also throw everything (keeper or not) into other collections (e.g. Right now, every time I dump a card on my computer, I grab everything that looks like it has worth and throw it into an "In Progress" collection. Will the forthcoming X-Transformer work as an external editor? This would support my workflow tremendously. I know, I'm spoiled from years of not needing a separate RAW converter. It's good but, the workflow - not being able to use Iridient as an external editor - is driving me nuts.
#Iridient x transformer vs sylk mac#
I'm on a Mac and playing with Iridient now to see how the RAW conversion works. I was Canon, but dumped all my gear and jumped on the X train. I'm a total noob to Fuji and finding my way through all the changes.